跳到主要內容

questions about mindfulness and concentration

I have some questions about mindfulness and concentration. 


In the teachings, Thay says we should practice mindfulness in our daily lives and be aware of everything happening at this moment. But we are often doing multiple things simultaneously. For example, if I am washing the dishes, I am also breathing, seeing the splashes, and hearing the sounds of the water. With multiple perceptions and feelings at the same time, which one should we be mindful of?


In one of the mindfulness practices Thay taught us, he says we can practice listening to music with mindfulness. This means being mindful of the music and the melodies while also aware of our breath. But shouldn't we focus on one thing at a time? How can we be mindful of multiple things simultaneously?


When we are concentrated, do we remain mindful and aware of what is happening? For example, if I am listening to a Dharma talk, should I be aware of the words being said or the fact that I am listening to a talk from this Zen master at this place? If I think about all these things, am I still concentrated?


When we are concentrated, we forget about everything else. We don't think about anything else. If I wash the dishes mindfully, I should focus only on washing the dishes and forget about everything else. If that is concentration, then when I am watching a TV show, I forget about everything else and am totally absorbed in the show. What is the difference between that state and being concentrated while washing dishes?


And one more question. Thay says mindfulness is mindfulness of something, but things have names, and names are notions. When there are names, there are illusions. Say if I am practicing mindfulness of my breath, but my breathing is made of non-breathing elements like air, muscles, lungs, and blood. So when I think I am mindful of my breath, what exactly am I mindful of?




Several thoughts along with the contemplation of these questions:


1. we create suffering by projecting happiness.

2. the best reason for practicing doing things in mindfulness is ‘because I like it.’

3. One of the practices for cultivating compassion is to contemplate on your biggest enemy, namely the person who gives you the most hardship in your life, thinking about why he/she does so. what kind of wrong perceptions have triggered the person to harm you?

Upon contemplating this question, it appears to me that the person who gives me the most hardship in my life is myself. It is my ignorance and habitual energy that have contributed to my suffering. 

So self-understanding and compassion arise. I realize that I should not attribute my suffering to someone else, but I should not blend myself neither. it is ignorance and the wrong perceptions in me that is the root of my suffering. 


留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

after lives

There was a time when I had this question on my mind: If there are countless after lives, meaning we will come back again and again, until an infinite future, why do we have to practice diligently this life?  Why can’t we just play around and have fun this life and then in one of our after lives, we start to practice. It will never be too late because we will have infinite after lives.  But as I learn more and more about mindfulness practice, I realize that Buddhism practice is not for reaching an ultimate goal to become enlightened. Mindfulness practice is to become happy, and to reduce suffering.  So why do we have to wait until future lives to start becoming happy when we can become happy right here and right now? you can be happy right here and right now and when you do that, you are enlightened, you are a Buddha. # Jill Yang

2020/10/05 英翻中:考監存廢》考監院的起源 出於古中國御史諫官與科舉制度 To Go or Not to Go? The Origin of Control Yuan and Examination Yuan.

 【 公視新聞網 】 李宜芳 董容慈 / 整理報導  2020-07-10 15:51 最後更新:2020-07-13 15:32 超越黨派公正獨立行使職權這種事行,根本就不存在。 英美法導論教授直白地說:「司法獨立這種事情根本就不存在。」 嘖嘖嘖。 再不好好寫論文,畢業證書就會不存在啦 

When is the beginning of a new life?

I just read about a news article showing a poll that says 6 in 10 U.S. adults support protecting the rights of embryos to some degree. It mentioned a court ruling in Alabama state, which says embryos, even fertilized outside the womb, have equal rights as humans do. This ruling almost forced IVF treatment centers in Alabama to halt operation because if embryos are indeed humans, they are basically killing hundreds of lives every year as they dispose unused embryos!  Absurd as the "embryo equals human" argument seems at first glance, it actually leads to a deeper, philosophical question: when does life begin, and when does it end? According to the same poll, 3 in 10 Americans believe the statement: "human life begins at conception," which sounds perfectly logical. But when put into legal context, not so much. The Article 7 of the Civil Code of Taiwan stipulates that " An unborn child is considered as if it were already born with regard to its interests, except ...