跳到主要內容

一個公案

Sometimes I come up with my own 公案, a philosophical dialogue or question to contemplate.

This is a recent one:


Master: The Buddha is not confined to his skin. He is everywhere. So if you only see the Buddha as someone in a physical body, you are wrong. The Buddha is present in the entire universe.


Student: Dear Master, why do you say the Buddha is everywhere in the universe? I can't see how the Buddha can be found in the farthest star or at a time before the Buddha Shakyamuni.


Master: What Buddha?



This came to me after I listened to a Dharma talk from Thich Nhat Hanh on "there is action but no actor".

Whenever we wonder "who" is doing "what", "when" and "where", we are caught in the wrong perceptions and are blinded by wrong questions. It's like asking "where is the parallel universe?" That's a false question because space and location are in the universe, not the universe is in the space.


And this also came to me after I read the quote: "a pig sees everything as a pig." I found it so insightful because  humans try everything to find out reasons and rules of the world and apply "purposes" to the nature. But  that is a result of looking at the universe with our own narrow, humanistic views. The world is not obliged to make sense for humans and yet we need the world to be like a human and cannot accept the ideas that there may be no rules for the world and no meanings for lives. 

Think about this, when we say "this species has evolved to be this so as to have more chances to produce the next generations." It sounds as if we think the species is a single entity and is conscious about its will to expand its population. It's pure anthropomorphism. 


All the notions are only subject to human minds. "Here, there, reason, meaning, being, non-being", are all beyond question at the ultimate level. After all, if there are no minds, who would ask these questions?


Another related 公案 on my mind recently is the 公案 of a goose in a bottle

"A woman raised a goose in a bottle. When the goose had grown, she wanted to get it out without harming the goose, or breaking the bottle. How do you get the goose out of the bottle?"

The story continues as the Zen Master called the woman's name, and the woman responded. Then the Master said: problem solved.  


We create so many questions and problems with our minds and impose human perspectives to everything in the world, demanding them to be like this or that. 

If only we could let go of these views and notions, we could immediately enjoy the openness and wonder of the universe.


# Jill Yang

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

after lives

There was a time when I had this question on my mind: If there are countless after lives, meaning we will come back again and again, until an infinite future, why do we have to practice diligently this life?  Why can’t we just play around and have fun this life and then in one of our after lives, we start to practice. It will never be too late because we will have infinite after lives.  But as I learn more and more about mindfulness practice, I realize that Buddhism practice is not for reaching an ultimate goal to become enlightened. Mindfulness practice is to become happy, and to reduce suffering.  So why do we have to wait until future lives to start becoming happy when we can become happy right here and right now? you can be happy right here and right now and when you do that, you are enlightened, you are a Buddha. # Jill Yang

2020/10/05 英翻中:考監存廢》考監院的起源 出於古中國御史諫官與科舉制度 To Go or Not to Go? The Origin of Control Yuan and Examination Yuan.

 【 公視新聞網 】 李宜芳 董容慈 / 整理報導  2020-07-10 15:51 最後更新:2020-07-13 15:32 超越黨派公正獨立行使職權這種事行,根本就不存在。 英美法導論教授直白地說:「司法獨立這種事情根本就不存在。」 嘖嘖嘖。 再不好好寫論文,畢業證書就會不存在啦 

When is the beginning of a new life?

I just read about a news article showing a poll that says 6 in 10 U.S. adults support protecting the rights of embryos to some degree. It mentioned a court ruling in Alabama state, which says embryos, even fertilized outside the womb, have equal rights as humans do. This ruling almost forced IVF treatment centers in Alabama to halt operation because if embryos are indeed humans, they are basically killing hundreds of lives every year as they dispose unused embryos!  Absurd as the "embryo equals human" argument seems at first glance, it actually leads to a deeper, philosophical question: when does life begin, and when does it end? According to the same poll, 3 in 10 Americans believe the statement: "human life begins at conception," which sounds perfectly logical. But when put into legal context, not so much. The Article 7 of the Civil Code of Taiwan stipulates that " An unborn child is considered as if it were already born with regard to its interests, except ...