跳到主要內容

房地產英文:公寓、平房、透天厝英文怎麼說?

要講透天厝,可以有這兩個選擇:

single attached house, 是指單邊連棟屋(其中一面牆與隔壁相連)

single detached house 則是完全獨立,座落在基地中間的房子(如圖說明)






 








可以看房子的型態選擇適合的字眼~

還有很多其他的單字可以描述房屋,台灣常見的公寓大廈(還要繳管理費那種),外國人常說是 condo (condominium)。

Apartment 是指無產權的出租公寓。

英式英文會稱作 flat。

Bungalow 是只有一層樓的平房。

Cottage 是小木屋,通常在山上、湖邊、雪地,有斜屋頂那種。

Pre-fab 工廠做好直接運到基地放的房屋、組合屋,很多pre-fab非常豪華舒適,不是那種臨時搭建的組合屋。


這些是我最常看到的房屋英文,因為我很愛看裝潢節目🤣🤣


還有很多其他種類的房屋名稱,可以參考維基百科


other references:

1. 投資apartment還是condo-先搞清楚兩者有什麼不同

2. Single Attached vs Single Detached




#Jill Yang







大家講房子最簡單的只會想到 house

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

成佛有什麼用?what is the use of becoming a Buddha?

成佛有什麼用?What is the use of becoming a Buddha? This is a rhetorical question often asked by Zen Master Thich Nhat Hanh. We always have the presumption that life is for a purpose and every thing we do should contribute to that purpose, otherwise it's useless. This ubiquitous utilitarianism dominates our modern society. It's so deep and prevalent that we can't even recognize we are acting under its influence. I was reading the book "The Miracle of Mindfulness" by Thich Nhat Hanh this week. He emphasizes on being mindful of one's breath, body movements, feelings and emotions a lot. That means we should be aware of our in breath and out breath at every moment, even when we are doing our work or talking to somebody.  While I seem to know what he's saying, I don't really understand why we should do that? Why should we be aware of our breath when it goes so well automatically? Why do we bother to mind it if human beings have evolved such a long way to make our ...

(新聞翻譯)The Mongolian Rooney, the thief, and the fightback 蒙古版魯尼,詐騙,與反擊

    News from BBC, by Owen Amos , 20 July 2020 On a cold, dark Mongolian morning, a teenager leaves his family's tent and heads to school through thick, smoky air.It's 06:00 and -20C (-4F). School 107, on the edge of the capital Ulaanbaatar, doesn't open for two hours. But Ochiroo Batbold has a key.   天色未亮、寒風刺骨的蒙古清晨,少年起身離開他的蒙古包,穿過空氣中漫布的白煙,前往坐落在首都烏蘭巴托郊區的「 107 學校」。現在是早上 6 點,氣溫僅僅零下 20 度(負 4 度 F )。距離學校開門的時間還有兩小時,但是少年,奧奇魯‧巴特伯德,有鑰匙可以進入。

一個公案

Sometimes I come up with my own 公案, a philosophical dialogue or question to contemplate. This is a recent one: Master: The Buddha is not confined to his skin. He is everywhere. So if you only see the Buddha as someone in a physical body, you are wrong. The Buddha is present in the entire universe. Student: Dear Master, why do you say the Buddha is everywhere in the universe? I can't see how the Buddha can be found in the farthest star or at a time before the Buddha Shakyamuni. Master: What Buddha? This came to me after I listened to a Dharma talk from Thich Nhat Hanh on "there is action but no actor". Whenever we wonder "who" is doing "what", "when" and "where", we are caught in the wrong perceptions and are blinded by wrong questions. It's like asking "where is the parallel universe?" That's a false question because space and location are in the universe, not the universe is in the space. And this also came to me ...